Reviews on Area on Aging and Help With Handicap Remodeling
Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 2019 Jun; sixteen(11): 1951.
Housing Design and Community Care: How Home Modifications Reduce Care Needs of Older People and People with Disability
Phillippa Carnemolla
1School of Built Environment, Kinesthesia of Design, Architecture and Building, University of Engineering science Sydney, Harris St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
Catherine Bridge
2Faculty of Built Environs, University of New Southward Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; ua.ude.wsnu@egdirb.c
Received 2019 April vii; Accepted 2019 May 22.
Abstract
The extent to which housing pattern can minimise levels of community caregiving has remained largely unmeasured. This paper reports the potential for home modifications to reduce caregiving in the peoples' homes, specially older people and people with a disability. It contributes to new knowledge in understanding how housing can play a role in customs caregiving and acknowledges the role of the built environs in managing care levels in ageing societies. This newspaper analyses self-reported care information from 157 Australian community care recipients (average age: 72 years) who had received home modifications inside the past 6 months. A before/after comparison of care provided revealed that home modifications reduced hours of care provided by 42% per week. More detailed assay revealed that the positive clan of dwelling modifications with care reduction is stronger with informal care (46% reduction) followed by formal care (16% reduction). These results propose the role that home modifications, and housing pattern in general, play in reducing care needs in a community setting.
Keywords: housing, informal intendance, formal care, habitation modification, disability, ageing, accessibility
1. Introduction
The design and construction of housing impacts the quality of life and independence of a population, specially one that is ageing [1]. The layout and structure of a home can trigger the need for paid care in the home or having to leave dwelling house to enter an aged intendance facility. Therefore, understanding the relationships betwixt housing and health will help to ameliorate the sustainability of community care models that support the independence and wellbeing of older people living at habitation.
The research presented in this paper examines changes in intendance requirements following abode modifications for people ageing at dwelling and receiving customs care. "Home modification" describes "structural changes fabricated to the homes of older people and people living with a disability" [2]. Home modifications are typically prescribed past an occupational therapist and are designed to support a person's ability to live independently at home.
The potential for change to the built environment to reduce levels of disability, reduce healthcare cost and improve quality of life has been well documented [iii,4]. However, the fashion in which alter to the built environment relates directly to the demand for care in the dwelling is underexplored and unmeasured. Where related enquiry has been conducted, information technology is difficult to synthesise due to the heterogenous nature of the enquiry designs and the variations in what and how an intervention is measured. A systematic review of home modification prove establish that most related studies are multifactorial, where dwelling house modifications form a minor office of an integrated care or health service approach. These multifactorial studies have made the furnishings of changes to buildings themselves hard to predict and incommunicable to separate from results [2].
As we experience increasing need for care within our communities, a result of the consequence of demographic changes and de-institutionalisation [five,half-dozen,7], there is a need to empathize what role housing can play in reducing levels of care. This paper seeks to fill this gap by presenting research that measures changes in caregiving resulting directly from home modifications involving structural improvements to accessibility and safety. By comparing weekly intendance hours reported in the homes of a sample of 157 community intendance clients both before and after their home modifications, this newspaper provides an assay of both formal (paid) and informal (unpaid) care in the context of improved housing conditions.
The paper begins by defining what is meant by the term "domicile modification" and highlighting culling terminology. This is followed by an overview of the diverse testify base on the event of home modification. It and so goes on to draw the study pattern, which involves the measurement of changes in weekly care hours provided in the habitation following home modifications. The results are and then presented in the form of the demographic descriptive statistics followed by the care data, which indicates that home modifications directly resulted in community care saving, both informal and formal. Finally, the conclusion section summarises the findings on dwelling modifications and intendance in the context of the sample.
ane.one. Habitation Modifications
Home modifications are defined as "changes made to the domicile environment to help people to exist more independent and safe in their own home and reduce any risk of injury to their carers and careworkers" [8]. Dwelling modifications present a unique opportunity to directly measure how housing practices impact health and intendance every bit they are increasingly recognised every bit an effective policy and exercise response to support frail, older people and those living with a disability to remain at home [9,10]. Exploring how habitation modification affects care outcomes acknowledges the part of housing in managing problems associated with maintaining levels of intendance in an ageing society where customs care is promoted and preferred.
Research into abode modifications is conducted beyond the fields of housing and health. A number of studies have described the dynamic of the interdisciplinary nature of the topic "complex" [xi,12]. Within the show base in that location are a range of terms existence used to draw abode modifications, including housing accommodation, assistive technology, ecology intervention and abode adaptation. In that location are also some inconsistencies in the definition and telescopic of the interventions, with some studies including personal engineering science or the moving of article of furniture as function of the intervention.
Home modifications are themselves diverse in design and purpose, and can include major structural changes such as adding ramps, lifts or widening doors. They can likewise include minor, not-structural additions including assistive devices within or outside the home such as grab runway and handrails.
Given the shift abroad from institutional care towards a reliance on abode-based or community care internationally [thirteen], research that considers and measures the benefits, both social and economical, of the built surroundings in the context of care provision volition help to guide policies that will ameliorate outcomes and the efficiencies of a customs care model. This evidence on home modifications forms the foundation of an important economic argument for the ongoing provision of care in the community, namely how capital investment in housing might reduce the ongoing need for (and ongoing costs of) intendance.
Scoping of the literature on home modifications reveals a variety of themes, including relationships with autumn prevention, the ageing process, wellbeing, improved role or independence, physical health and wellbeing, caregiving and economic effectiveness. An overview of the evidence follows, and gives a picture of the multidimensional means that the built surround impacts people'due south ability to alive independently in their own home, despite health changes.
1.1.1. Preventing Falls and Improving Safe
A number of studies investigate the relationship betwixt home modifications and fall prevention in some way. Virtually institute positive evidence that a home modification intervention can reduce the likelihood of a fall or injury occurring [fourteen,fifteen,16,17,18]. Even so, a review by Wahl et al. [19] found no evidence of effect on fall prevention following abode modification intervention.
1.1.two. Improved Function and Independence
There is a drove of inquiry that examines the relationship between dwelling house modifications and improved function and independence. A number of studies have found evidence of a relationship between abode modifications and improved function (past reducing difficulty regarding activities of daily living) [xix,20,21,22,23,24]. The research by Sheffield (2013) found there was no link between home modifications and function merely did find evidence of a reduction in fear of falling and increases in safety [25]. Szanton et al. [23] also found improvements in the ability to provide self-intendance post-obit home modifications.
i.1.3. Physical Wellness and Wellbeing
Two random controlled trials directly measured the effect of home modifications on wellbeing and determined evidence of a human relationship between home modifications and increased quality of life [26,27]. Studies past Heywood and Turner [28] and Andrich, Ferrario & Moi [29] use qualitative methods to demonstrate the existence of a relationship betwixt abode modifications and wellbeing.
1.1.4. Ageing Procedure
Studies that investigate housing and the ageing process tend to focus on either supporting ageing in place in full general or reducing the progression of frailty. Mitoku and Shimanouchi [30] reports on the evidence that dwelling house modifications dull the progression of frailty. Three studies report on the effect of home modifications on ageing in place [31,32,33]. Tanner et al. [34] reports that modifications contribute to the meaning of home for older people. Renaut, Ogg, Petite and Chamahian [35] establish more neutral results and found that home modifications practice not necessarily contribute to how people adapt to dwelling. The study by Ahn and Hegde [36] did not find a link between home modifications and home environment satisfaction.
1.1.5. Caregiving
In most of the studies that accept investigated caregiving and housing changes, abode modifications are included as part of a larger study of interventions, e.g., assistive engineering science. These studies establish a positive clan and reported a reduced need for intendance [21,22,37], support of caregiving practices [38,39] or offsetting of institutionalisation [40].
Despite this extensive torso of evidence, one of the primary gaps to overcome is the lack of research that isolates home modifications as a single intervention. The prevalence of multifactorial interventions in the studies means that the event of housing on these outcomes cannot be isolated. The project research design presented in this paper has addressed this consequence.
1.2. Concepts of Customs Intendance and Housing
In managing the needs of older people or people living with a inability, the developed globe continues to move away from institutionalised models of caregiving and towards individualised care solutions [41]. This has meant a move away from largescale, institutional built environments specifically dedicated to high-volume caregiving, towards all levels and types of housing and adaptation having the propensity to suit levels of care provision. Caregiving in the home has become ane of the means to bridge the homo performance gaps created when a person'southward abode environment is not adequate for their level of functioning. Understanding the interactions between housing and caregiving reveals why buildings play a role in supporting intendance provision, and accessibility (or lack thereof) becomes a critical trigger for people existence forced into assisted living and residential care settings.
I of the reasons older people and people with a disability are required to transition from living at home to an assisted living facility or residential care setting lies in feelings of incompetence to complete tasks independently (increased caregiving) and unsuitable housing design [42]. Countries like Australia, and others throughout the developed globe, continue to experience increasing demand for community care services and the relationship betwixt care and housing is poorly understood. Set amongst a housing stock of predominantly inaccessible, older buildings, the full general lack of suitable housing for people with care needs further highlights how, for people living with a disability at any age, the issues of finding accessible and secure housing to complement specific care needs long-term are an ongoing business [43].
In gild to understand how abode modifications substitute for caregiving, it is important to classify what is meant by community care and the types of community intendance that tin can exist provided in the home. Community care encompasses a wide range of tasks, intentions and health and welfare frameworks. The World Wellness Organisation defines community care as the "services and support to help people with care needs to live as independently every bit possible in their communities" [44]. In the Western context, community care also refers to the fix of legal and practical arrangements implemented by health and social welfare agencies to facilitate the relative independence of a person inside community setting.
Community intendance is provided by either paid care staff (formal care) or by family unit members (breezy care). Types of customs care can include personal intendance (such every bit toileting, washing or feeding), medical care, or domestic assistance (housework).
ane.three. Commutation of Care
Forth with the understanding that care formats tin can alloy with each other is the theory that in some cases, intendance types will substitute for each other [45,46]. This understanding forms the premise of the nowadays written report design that tests whether building construction in the form of home modifications can provide an alternative solution to community care (formal and informal intendance) past supporting self-care and maintaining independence levels in the home.
In that location is a body of show that elucidates the effects of home modifications to better independence health and wellbeing; however, there appears to be far less empirical research into whether in that location is any commutation of care occurring post-obit modifications to housing. What is articulate in the evidence, still, is an understanding of the corporeality of care existence provided within a community setting, predominantly in people's homes. In an Australian context, where the inquiry reported in this paper was undertaken, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Caring in the Community information indicates that forty% of all Australian households include a person who is providing informal intendance [47]. In earlier ABS reports, 94% of older people living in the customs who required in-home intendance received assistance from the informal care network [48]. Approximately 33% of older people receiving support received a combination of informal carers and formal services, implying that both care types can and do part interdependently and blend with each other [49]. This leaves a very minor pct relying solely on formal care aid provided by a community organisation or a wellness professional.
An over reliance on informal care can lead to increased stress and decreased health for carers [fifty] and tin have implications on human capital by taking people out of the workforce [51,52,53]. One of the major impacts of informal caring is a lower probability of employment on the part of the carer [54,55]. Formal care is also under increased pressure level due to changes in how care is provided inside families, too equally the desire for older people requiring care to "historic period in identify" at dwelling house. Increasing labour shortages in the care industry and the high demand for care (which currently exceeds the supply) are identified as crucial areas of aged care policy requiring alternative and innovative care solutions [56,57]. Understanding of the bear on of high levels of care need in the customs leads to a realisation of the significance of this study. For instance, what if capital investment in the built environment could substitute for ongoing care demand?
two. Materials and Methods
This paper focuses on the measurement of care changes before and later on home modifications. The study design is comprised of a single-arm and incorporates a cantankerous-sectional data capture of participants "pre and post" survey responses. The study surveyed a sample of 157 people who had received home modifications via an Australian government-subsidised dwelling house modification programme. In order to exist eligible to be included in the study, participants had to exist community-dwelling clients of a government-subsidised community care program known as Home and Community Care (HACC) who had received dwelling house modifications inside the previous 6 months.
Having participants sourced from within a government-subsidised programme of home modification means that privately-funded abode modifications are excluded from this research. There are ii reasons for this approach. Outset, there was no fundamental registry of privately-funded home modifications from which to source participants finer. Second, targeting regime-registered dwelling modifications enabled access to boosted data of accurate and consistent home modification costs and type, equally well as the wellness data for each participant.
A survey was designed to examine the home modification experiences of participants and sought intendance hours earlier and after home modification, self-reported as weekly hours of informal and formal care. The surveys were distributed via home modification providers in NSW, Commonwealth of australia. Surveys were posted as function of a standard follow-up to recent recipients of habitation modifications where all modifications had been completed within the previous 6 months.
The survey included four multiple-choice questions requesting demographic data such as tenure and income status. This was followed past a section on formal and informal care associated with bathing, toileting or moving around the business firm. Care was separated into categories of informal and formal, and recorded every bit cocky-reported hours per calendar week. The final question was open-ended, seeking people'south comments on how home modifications may take inverse their wellness and/or care needs.
The research and survey instrument was introduced to prospective participants by the prescribing occupational therapists at the time of the habitation modification completion. The surveys were separately posted direct to prospective participants along with an information canvas explaining key care terms "formal" and "breezy" every bit "paid" and "unpaid" intendance, respectively. These instructions included explanation of how to fill in the survey correctly and self-report hours of care on the form.
Participants recalled their pre-abode modification care as well as their current (mail-abode modification) intendance. Although this introduced the possibility of recall bias, it was considered the most effective way of conducting an exploratory study of changing care needs and minimising the issues of participant attrition, which is a heightened concern when interacting with fragile, older people. The self-reported data was likewise potentially influenced by social compliance bias (also known equally social desirability bias). The potential for responses to be more favourable to please or thank the home modification provider was recognised and this bias was minimised in two ways: first, past assurances of anonymity, and second the survey was returned straight to the researcher, not the home modification provider.
Parameters around the housing aspect of the study were of import. The definition of abode modification was made clear from the showtime as being structural changes to a person's home to enable them to remain living in the community. The HACC programme from which the participants were sourced provided interventions inside the agreed definition of dwelling house modification. The survey responses were matched to deidentified customer files that included information on the type of abode modifications installed. This meant that home modifications included in the study were analysed by blazon.
Sample Response Rate
1 hundred and lx-five habitation modification recipients responded to the survey. Later eliminating eight incomplete or invalid responses, a total of 157 respondents were included in the assay. This yielded a survey response rate of 24.1% (157 participants out of a sample of 650 eligible participants).
Ideals approving was granted past the University of New Due south Wales Human Enquiry Ethics Commission (UNSW HREC) in November 2014 (ETH-125082).
iii. Results
In this section, the survey results are documented. Outset, descriptive statistics of the sample are presented. These include an assay of gender, age, housing tenure, living organization and source of income. 2d, the care 60 minutes data is presented in terms of care type (breezy and formal care) for earlier and later habitation modifications.
3.one. Descriptive Statistics
The descriptive statistics for the sample are set out in Tabular array one.
Table one
Descriptive Statistics.
| Count | Percentage of Total Sample | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | 72 | |
| Gender | 157 | |
| Female | 85 | 54.1% |
| Male person | 72 | 45.ix% |
| Housing tenure | ||
| Being purchased | two | one.27% |
| Fully owned | 149 | 94.ninety% |
| Alive with family members | two | ane.27% |
| Own caravan/annex and rent site | 1 | 0.64% |
| Rental (individual) | 2 | one.27% |
| Retirement village | one | 0.64% |
| Living arrangements | ||
| Lives alone | 43 | 26.75% |
| Lives with a spouse or partner | 84 | 53.fifty% |
| Lives with family unit or friends | 30 | 19.11% |
| Income source | ||
| Carers allowance | ii | one.27% |
| Disability support pension | 28 | 17.83% |
| Full anile pension | 102 | 64.97% |
| Part aged pension | 16 | 10.nineteen% |
| Self-funded retiree | 8 | five.x% |
| Wage or bacon (full time) | i | 0.64% |
The average historic period of the sample was establish to be 72 years at the fourth dimension of data collection. In an analysis of gender within the sample, females outnumbered males by 5:4, with 85 participants in the study being female person (54.one%). The survey requested information on housing tenure and Table 1 shows that the sample were probable to exist owner/occupiers of their ain homes (94.9%).
Reporting on the living arrangements of participants, the majority lived with a spouse or partner (53.5%); while 19.one% were living with family or friends and 26.8% of respondents reported living lone. This is a lower representation than reported in the HACC Minimum Data Set, where 42% of the NSW HACC customer population were reported as living alone.
Respondents were asked about their chief source of income. A majority of the participants (65.0%) were supported by a full anile pension; 17.83% received a inability support alimony and x.19% received a part aged alimony. A smaller percentage (1.27%) was supported past a carer's assart. A total of 5.8% were either self-funded retires (5.ane%) or on a full-time wage or salary (0.64%). At the time of the data collection, the report sample were overwhelmingly (94.three%) dependent on government welfare as their main source of income, signalling economical vulnerability.
3.2. Domicile Modification Results
Information was captured about the type and location of the dwelling house modifications within the sample, these are illustrated in Effigy 1 below. This enabled a moving picture to be drawn of the range of modifications that were included under the banner of "home modifications" and where in the house they were located. Major bathroom modifications were the most prevalent unmarried type, followed by handrails for the front or rear access to the firm.
Dwelling house modification frequency by type. Annotation: Where participants received major bathroom modifications, they were not included in the count for other, itemised bathroom modifications. Kitchen and laundry modifications refer to cabinet height/design changes, widening of work areas or mounting of appliances for easier admission.
3.iii. Care Results
The care data results revealed whether a home modification inverse the amount of care provided in the home. The before and after intendance was measured as weekly hours and tested as pre–post paired samples for significance, using SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY, USA). The results of the paired t-exam indicated that for all care types, changes in intendance hours following home modifications were statistically significant. Fifty-fifty for the least significant event (formal care), p was 0.04, which is <0.05.
For informal care provision, there is strong evidence (t = 6.39, p = 0.00) that home modifications reduced the need for informal care. In this data set, it reduced breezy intendance hours by approximately vi h per week, with a 95% confidence interval of between four.12 and 7.eight h per week savings.
For formal care provision, there is evidence (t = ii.08, p = 0.04) that home modifications reduced the need. In this data set, it reduced formal care hours past approximately 0.36 h per week, with a 95% confidence interval of between 0.02 and 0.7 h per week savings.
For full care provision (formal + breezy intendance) at that place is potent bear witness (t = 6.8, p = 0.00) that abode modifications reduced the need for care. In this data set, it reduced total care hours by approximately vi.32 h per calendar week, with a 95% confidence interval of between 4.48 and 8.fifteen h per week savings.
Figure 2 shows the pre–post care results as a comparison of combined formal and informal care earlier abode modifications (full 15.02 h per week) and combined formal and informal care after home modifications (total viii.7 h per week):
Assay of care hours before and later on home modifications.
four. Word
Changes in intendance provided in the dwelling house tell a story about overall independence, autonomy and the power to maintain electric current housing situations. Savings in breezy care post-obit a home modification reveal a story about both carer and recipient, directly reflecting factors such equally homo capital and carer stress in a community. Alternatively, changes to formal care reveal a story well-nigh costs to government and health systems.
The research findings suggest that home modifications support a model of self-care and substitute for both informal and formal intendance provided in the abode. This relationship is stronger in breezy intendance than in formal care. The reason behind the college sensitivity of informal care hours over formal care hours following home modifications is unclear; yet, at that place are a number of possible explanations. First, informal care is provided in such a way that it can respond more than flexibly to changes in demand in the home. In dissimilarity, government-subsidised formal care has assessment, assistants and eligibility requirements that are managed separately from the home modification interventions, and therefore are less likely to exist flexible. Second, it is possible that formal intendance variations may non be fully captured past the survey because of the time lag between receiving abode modifications and administering changes to formal care. Third, given the shortage of care services and difficulty in obtaining government-subsidised intendance, people may be reluctant to give up any intendance they currently receive, preferring to use it in other ways. This in turn implies a level of unmet need for care in the community, which has been acknowledged in previous studies [58].
The written report sample, while too participating in a regime-subsidised program of home modifications, likewise proved to exist overwhelmingly dependent on regime welfare, signalling economic vulnerability. At the time of the data collection, eligibility into the domicile modifications plan was not dependent on whatever ways testing; however, it was prioritised according to vulnerability to residential care.
The written report sample were also found to be overwhelmingly the owners/occupiers of their own homes (94%). It signals that older, private renters are less likely to access dwelling house modification services compared to homeowners. Although home ownership has been the about common tenure in older populations in Commonwealth of australia, this is starting to change [59], and suggests the need for ongoing investigation into home modification rights and access to services.
Home modifications have been studied across a number of fields (including housing and health) and their furnishings are various. As an intervention, they have been found to positively impact the independence, autonomy, self-care and wellbeing of people living at home with care (older people as well every bit people living with disability) [2]. This study further supports the evidence base of operations of the domicile modification literature and provides the previously unmeasured effect of abode modifications on direct hours of intendance provided inside the habitation.
The findings in this exploratory study stand for a significant contribution to understanding the congenital surroundings equally information technology relates to man performance and human touch on for two reasons. First, they highlight how important buildings are to the ongoing independence of the populations. Second, they enhance the possibility that a upper-case letter investment in the built surroundings tin offer ongoing returns in care cost savings. This economic argument is in line with other studies [18,60].
Having acknowledged some of the limitations previously, the present written report design is exploratory. Information technology makes a pregnant contribution to the built surround enquiry and housing research because the care data is collected as master data, specifically for this study as it relates to built environment alter. This means that home modifications are measured every bit a single factor housing intervention, without other interventions, such as therapies or assistive engineering. The exclusion of other interventions means the implications of housing change in the results are transparent.
5. Conclusions
The findings in this study confirm the positive man impact effects of modifying housing, in detail bathrooms, providing evidence that home modifications directly support those needing intendance and reduce corporeality of care required in the home. One of this study's strengths is that it uses primary information, drawing on original, self-reported intendance hr data for both earlier and after the home modifications, enabling a previously under-explored interaction between home modification and community intendance.
The data analysed in this paper synthesises knowledge in the fields of wellness and built surroundings, acknowledging the built environment every bit potentially playing a primal function in issues associated with maintaining care and independence in a dwelling house setting. In terms of the effectiveness of dwelling house modifications, the study demonstrates that installing home modifications direct results in a reduction in the need for care in the habitation by up to 46%. This is a significant consequence, comprised predominantly of savings made from the reduction in informal care hours.
The results confirm evidence of a human relationship across housing and care, and therefore support the case for housing policy and wellness care reforms to be considered meantime. Other expected benefits of reducing the need for both formal and informal care in the home include a reduced toll of caregiving, and the power for breezy caregivers to piece of work outside the home impacting available man capital in the workforce. These benefits warrant farther enquiry in the context of built environment effects.
The enquiry has important implications for blueprint and construction approaches and has relevance for built environment professionals, supporting an understanding of the broader "homo touch" implications of populations choosing to stay at dwelling house as they proceed to historic period. Further inquiry is warranted to consolidate the interdisciplinary metrics beyond built environs and wellness care. The economic benefits of a capital investment in housing is the subject area of a toll utility analysis of home modifications currently being planned for publication.
Author Contributions
Together the authors conceptualised the research. Primary author Phillippa Carnemolla collected the data, contributed to the data and analysis tools, performed the assay and wrote the newspaper. Catherine Bridge contributed to the assay tools and provided editing and structural input.
Funding
This piece of work was supported by funding from an Australian Mail Graduate Award (APA) and a fractional scholarship from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Plant (AHURI).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
1. Oswald F., Wahl H.Due west., Schilling O., Nygren C., Fänge A., Sixsmith A., Iwarsson S. Relationships betwixt housing and healthy aging in very erstwhile age. Gerontologist. 2007;47:96–107. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.one.96. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
ii. Carnemolla P., Bridge C. A scoping review of home modifications interventions—Mapping the evidence base of operations. Indoor Congenital Environ. 2018 doi: 10.1177/1420326X18761112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
three. Altman B., Barnartt S. Environmental Contexts and Disability. Volume 8 Emerald Grouping Publishing; London, UK: 2014. [Google Scholar]
five. Cangiano A., Shutes I., Spencer S., Leeson Chiliad. Migrant Care Workers in Ageing Societies: Research Findings in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland. Academy of Oxford; Oxford, Britain: 2009. [Google Scholar]
vii. Simonazzi A. Care regimes and national employment models. Camb. J. Econ. 2009;33:211–232. doi: 10.1093/cje/ben043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Adams T., Bridge C., Carnemolla P., McNamara N., Quinn J. Consumer Factsheet Series. Domicile Modification Data Clearinghouse; Sydney, Commonwealth of australia: 2014. Consumer Factsheet: Arranging Home Modifications. [Google Scholar]
nine. Fänge A., Iwarsson S. Changes in ADL dependence and aspects of usability following housing adaptation—A longitudinal perspective. Am. J. Occupational Ther. 2005;59:296–304. doi: 10.5014/ajot.59.3.296. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Pynoos J. Toward a national policy on home modification. Technol. Disabil. 1993;2:i–8. [Google Scholar]
11. Johansson M., Lilja Grand., Petersson I., Borell 50. Operation of activities of daily living in a sample of applicants for home modification services. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 2007;xiv:44–53. doi: 10.1080/11038120601094997. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Lord Due south., Menz H., Sherrington C. Dwelling house environment risk factors for falls in older people and the efficacy of home modifications. Age Ageing. 2006;35:55–59. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl088. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Coyte P.C., McKeever P. Home care in Canada: Passing the buck. Tin can. J. Nursing Res. 2001;33:eleven–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
fourteen. Chang J.T., Morton S.C., Rubenstein L.Z., Mojica Westward.A., Maglione Grand., Suttorp Yard.J., Shekelle P.G. Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: Systematic review and meta-assay of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 2004;328:680. doi: x.1136/bmj.328.7441.680. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
xv. Clemson L., Mackenzie L., Ballinger C., Shut J., Cumming R. Environmental interventions to prevent falls in community-abode older people a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J. Crumbling Wellness. 2008;twenty:954–971. doi: 10.1177/0898264308324672. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Tse T. The surroundings and falls prevention: Practise ecology modifications make a departure? Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 2005;52:271–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00525.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Turner Southward., Arthur G., Lyons R.A., Weightman A.L., Isle of mann M.Chiliad., Jones South.J., Lannon S., Rolfe B., Kemp A., Johansen A. Modification of the dwelling environs for the reduction of injuries. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011;16 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003600.pub3. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Wahl H., Fänge A., Oswald F., Gitlin Fifty., Iwarsson S. The home environment and disability-related outcomes in crumbling individuals: What is the empirical bear witness? Gerontologist. 2009;49:355–367. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp056. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Hunt C., Mann K., Wasek S., Arbesman 1000. Systematic review of the effect of home modification and fall prevention programs on falls and the functioning of community-abode older adults. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2012;66:284–291. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.005017. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Gitlin L., Corcoran M., Winter Fifty., Boyce A., Hauck W. A randomized, controlled trial of a dwelling environmental intervention: Effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontologist. 2001;41:4. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.1.4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Isle of man Westward., Ottenbacher Yard., Fraas Fifty., Tomita Thou., Granger C. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Arch. Family unit Med. 1999;8:210–217. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.3.210. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Szanton South., Wolff J., Leff B., Thorpe R., Tanner Due east., Boyd C., Gitlin L. CAPABLE trial: A randomized controlled trial of nurse, occupational therapist and handyman to reduce inability amongst older adults: Rationale and design. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2014;38:102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.03.005. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Wilson D., Mitchell J., Kemp B., Adkins R., Mann W. Furnishings of assistive technology on functional turn down in people aging with a disability. Assist. Technol. 2009;21:208–217. doi: ten.1080/10400430903246068. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Sheffield C., Smith C., Becker M. Evaluation of an Agency-Based Occupational Therapy Intervention to Facilitate Aging in Identify. Gerontologist. 2013;53:907–918. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns145. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Ahmad J., Shakil-ur-Rehman S., Sibtain F. Effectiveness of abode modification on quality of life on cycle chair user paraplegic population. Rawal Med. J. 2013;38:263–265. [Google Scholar]
27. Lin M., Wolf S., Hwang H., Gong S., Chen C. A randomized, controlled trial of fall prevention programs and quality of life in older fallers. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2007;55:499–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01146.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Heywood F., Turner L. Better Outcomes, Lower Costs. Implications for Health and Social Care Budgets of Investment in Housing Adaptations, Improvements and Equipment: Review of the Testify. London Office for Disability Bug/Department of Work and Pensions; London, Britain: 2007. [Google Scholar]
29. Andrich R., Ferrario M., Moi M. A model of toll-effect analysis for assistive technology. Disability Rehabil. 1998;20:ane–24. doi: ten.3109/09638289809166850. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Mitoku K., Shimanouchi Southward. Home Modification and Prevention of Frailty Progression in Older Adults: A Japanese Prospective Accomplice Study. J. Gerantol. Nursing. 2014:one–8. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140311-02. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Hwang E., Cummings L., Sixsmith A., Sixsmith J. Impacts of home modifications on aging-in-place. J. Housing Elderly. 2011;25:246–257. doi: 10.1080/02763893.2011.595611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Safran-Norton C. Physical home environment as a determinant of aging in identify for different types of elderly households. J. Housing Elderly. 2010;24:208–231. doi: 10.1080/02763891003757494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Pettersson C., Löfqvist C., Malmgren Fänge A. Clients' experiences of housing adaptations: A longitudinal mixed-methods report. Disability Rehabil. 2012;34:1706–1715. doi: ten.3109/09638288.2012.660596. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Tanner B., Tilse C., De Jonge D. Restoring and sustaining home: The bear on of home modifications on the pregnant of home for older people. J. Housing Elderly. 2008;22:195–215. doi: 10.1080/02763890802232048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Renaut Southward., Ogg J., Petite S., Chamahian A. Home environments and adaptations in the context of ageing. Ageing Soc. 2014:1–26. doi: x.1017/S0144686X14000221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Ahn M., Hegde A. Perceived aspects of home surroundings and home modifications past older people living in rural areas. J. Housing Elderly. 2011;25:18–xxx. doi: 10.1080/02763893.2011.545735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Concord E., Freedman 5., Cornman J., Wolf D., Marcott J. Reconsidering substitution in long-term intendance: When does assistive technology take the place of personal care? J. Gerontol. Serial B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2005;60:272–280. doi: 10.1093/geronb/sixty.5.S272. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Anderson W., Wiener J. The impact of assistive technologies on formal and breezy dwelling intendance. Gerontologist. 2013 doi: ten.1093/geront/gnt165. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Naik A.D., Gill T. Underutilization of environmental adaptations for bathing in community-living older persons. J. Am. Elderliness Soc. 2005;53:1497–1503. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53458.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
forty. Newman S., Struyk R., Wright P., Rice 1000. Overwhelming odds: Caregiving and the hazard of institutionalization. J. Gerontol. 1990;45:173–183. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.v.S173. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Hemingway Fifty. Disabled People and Housing: Choices, Opportunities and Barriers. Policy Printing; Bristol, UK: 2011. [Google Scholar]
42. Golant South.M. The quest for residential normalcy by older adults: Relocation but one pathway. J. Crumbling Stud. 2011;25:193–205. doi: x.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Beer A., Faulkner D. The Housing Careers of People with a Disability and Carers of People with a Disability. Australian Housing and Urban Research Constitute; Melbourne, Australia: 2008. [Google Scholar]
44. Andrews Yard., Faulkner D., Andrews M. A Glossary of Terms for Community Health Care and Services for Older Persons. World Health Arrangement; Paris, France: 2004. [Google Scholar]
45. Agree Due east., Freedman V. Incorporating assistive devices into customs-based long-term care: An analysis of the potential for substitution and supplementation. J. Aging Health. 2000;12:426. doi: x.1177/089826430001200307. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Bonsang E. Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal intendance in Europe? J. Health Econ. 2009;28:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Australian Bureau of Statistics . Disability, Ageing and Carers, Commonwealth of australia: Summary of Findings, 2012. Australian Authorities Publishing Service; Canberra, Commonwealth of australia: 2012. [Google Scholar]
48. Australian Agency of Statistics . Focus on Families: Caring Infamilies—Support for Persons Who are Older or Have Disabilities. Australian Government Publishing Service; Canberra, Australia: 1995. [Google Scholar]
49. Liu K., Manton K., Aragon C. Changes in home care apply by disabled elderly persons 1982–1994. J. Gerontol. Series B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2000;55:245–253. doi: 10.1093/geronb/55.iv.S245. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Pinquart M., Sörensen S. Correlates of physical wellness of informal caregivers: A meta-analysis. J. Gerontol. Series B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2007;62:126–137. doi: ten.1093/geronb/62.2.P126. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Bittman K., Hill T., Thomson C. The impact of caring on informal carers' employment, income and earnings: A longitudinal arroyo. Aust. J. Soc. Issues. 2007;42:255–272. doi: ten.1002/j.1839-4655.2007.tb00053.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Bolin K., Lindgren B., Lundborg P. Breezy and formal care amid single-living elderly in Europe. Health Econ. 2008;17:393–409. doi: 10.1002/hec.1275. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Van Houtven C.H., Coe N.B., Skira 1000.Yard. The consequence of informal care on piece of work and wages. J. Health Econ. 2013;32:240–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Carers Australia . Piece of work and Care: The Necessary Investment. Carers Australia; Canberra, Commonwealth of australia: 2014. Combining Piece of work and Care: The Benefits to Carers and the Economy. [Google Scholar]
55. Davies R., Grey C. Care pathways and designing the health-care built surroundings: An explanatory framework. Int. J. Care Pathw. 2009;xiii:seven–sixteen. doi: ten.1258/jicp.2008.009004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Ham C., Dixon A., Brooke B. Transforming the Delivery of Health and Social Care. The Case for Primal Change. King's Fund; London, UK: 2012. [Google Scholar]
57. Desai Yard., Lentzner H., Weeks J. Unmet need for personal assistance with activities of daily living among older adults. Gerontologist. 2001;41:82–88. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.1.82. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Lansley P., McCreadie C., Tinker A. Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive engineering science pay its way? Historic period Ageing. 2004;33:571–576. doi: ten.1093/ageing/afh190. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Australian Government . Housing Decisions of Older Australians, Productivity Committee Research Paper. Australian Government Publishing Service; Canberra, Australia: 2015. [Google Scholar]
60. Jutkowitz E., Gitlin L., Pizzi L., Lee Eastward., Dennis M. Toll Effectiveness of a Habitation Based Intervention That Helps Functionally Vulnerable Older Adults Age in Place at Home. J. Aging Res. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/680265. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Manufactures from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Wellness are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Found (MDPI)
thomascaulnureark.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6604004/
0 Response to "Reviews on Area on Aging and Help With Handicap Remodeling"
Post a Comment